As the final ice melted towards the end of the last ice age, grazers spread throughout Europe.  A diverse group of species, they included aurochs, red deer, wild boar, beavers and elephants.  As they were hunted by man, numbers decreased, but diversity remained high as they made their home in the pre-Neolithic forests (somewhere between 25,000 and 12,000 years ago).

Most argue that these forests were nearly completely closed canopy, with any open spaces few and far between.  Others argue that, at this time, grazers played a more prominent role, high enough in number to open up glades created by fallen trees - but not so high in number that other areas of forest couldn’t regenerate.  This would create high biodiversity through cycles of succession. Whichever version of this is correct, pre-Neolithic forests were vast, with huge areas of woodland and natural regeneration.  They existed existing alongside grazing animals and open areas, even if the levels of grazers are up for debate.

The arrival of the first early modern humans across Europe brought with them the first forest clearances.  This was in a time before agriculture: as glades and open spaces spread, grazers drove woodland-grassland processes and created a shifting mosaic of equally diverse habitats across the European landscape.  Moving into the Neolithic age, the age of farming, and small mixed farmsteads began to pop up.  With time, farms were run with increasingly sophisticated and diverse management, varying by year, by county, by socioeconomics, by tenure, by technology and by demographic.  Farming, and hence the landscape, entered a constant state of flux, emanating huge diversity, (even within similar habitats).

As we look back at this landscape, so far from the one we are familiar with today, what did forest actually mean and what did this landscape look like beyond the farmsteads.  Forests were open in the Neolithic age, forestis meant a combination of mixed grassland, trees, shrub, rivers, as well as lakes.  The term wood was only ever used to describe timber as it was used for building and for firewood.  The Neolithic landscape was an interconnected one, where species weren’t put into boxes based on habitat and were instead extensively managed in an open landscape and in a way that improved biodiversity rather than damaged it.

In the second century the population began to grow more rapidly; deforestation made way for arable land and firewood, and farms begin to locally specialise.  Seasonally grazed dens for pigs, heavily grazed vaccaries for cattle, as well as deer parks all became popular ways to farm. However, the landscape remained generally mixed and open.  Common grazing was frequently used, creating semi-natural habitats.

As this became more prevalent and grazing levels increased, natural defences were lost and so control measures were put in place.  These included closing hay meadows until late spring or early summer, placing extraction limits on coppiced woodland, protecting arable land from grazing until after the harvest or during fallow years.  Grazing animals couldn’t be moved between different areas of woodland or given supplementarily feeding, capping populations to a natural carrying capacity.  Medieval stints restricted grazing rights; they limited herd size, restricted the months areas could be grazed for, and limited the length of time areas could be grazed for.  These restrictions meant that grazing intolerant plants were offered a chance to battle on and throughout this period we see the creation of many of the habitats we now consider to be habitats of conservation value, such as our chalk grasslands here in Hampshire.

The landscape did continue to change, and our terminology of the time reflected that; throughout the medieval period enclosed spaces were commonly grazed and as areas were increasingly closed off, protected, managed, there became a distinction between wood, meadow, heath. 

Even though the landscape was beginning to fracture into separate habitats the period did still had cycles of land use.  By the end of the Middle Ages (so by the late 15^th, 16^th and 17^th centuries) farms were larger due to a more stable social structure. There were increases in herd sizes and fields became more fixed in place, but a complex mosaic of interdependent farming systems remained.

Taking a closer look at Hampshire, by the 18^th century, water meadows had been popularised, combining sheep and corn.  Irrigation systems were springing up; downland was flooded, productivity increased, and sheep and grazing limits were expanded.  Places like the New Forest only remained common grazing as they were too poor for crops.

Beyond the 18^th century, agriculture slowly shifted towards arable and intensification.  Chalkland farming boomed at the turn of the century and large areas of downland were ploughed; sheep grazing areas reduced but intensified.  Hedges appeared as downland was enclosed and beech shelters protected the remaining sheep.  Food was grown on the more productive water meadows, and growing false fodder for sheep such as turnips comes into frequent use.

By the 20^th century woodlands weren’t used as much as they once had been and extraction was reduced: timber from coppicing was in decline, along with the use of firewood.  The now enclosed, separated woodlands were managed less, grazed less and were dominated by a few specific, dominant species.  Biodiversity is at an all-time low.

We have seen a shift; dominant closed canopy forest with open glades became a heterogenous landscape, continually changing with high levels of extraction, managed woodlands, and extensive grazing.  The landscape was then intensified, grazers were lost, spaces enclosed and connectivity disappeared.  Increasing chemical inputs and supplementary feeding were the consequences as the landscape couldn’t hold larger and larger stocking rates.  Enclosing spaces, intensification and overgrazing has led to a significant loss of connectivity, and the loss of large herbivores and predators has led to the breakdown of natural processes, leaving biodiversity in tatters.

So, what now?  What do we do with a landscape that has become so disconnected and degraded?

One answer lies in restoring naturalistic grazing.  Different grazers have different grazing techniques and different methods of disturbance.  Some are tramplers, some are wallowers and some are good at snapping branches and de-barking trees. 

There are many kinds of grazer and different species and breeds have been used differently over time.  Here in Hampshire, we have seen the sheep-corn husbandry of the 18^th and 19^th centuries.  Sheep are highly selective but agile, and they compact the ground with their delicate hooves.  This prevents tree regeneration and creates a short tight sward.

In the southeast of England, wood-pasture systems were more common during this time.  These systems utilised pigs and cattle.  Pigs are particularly good for ensuring the long-term sustainability of wood-pasture, by improving forest floor biodiversity and, in open spaces, supporting the germination of saplings.  They are selective omnivorous grazers, they clear dense vegetation, create seedbeds and control weeds, but they also compact soil.  This can damage tree roots and prevent tree regeneration when grazing in enclosed spaces.

Cattle bring different characteristics again: being large and heavy they can manage excess scrub and support tree regeneration in woodlands.  They are also able to open up woodlands, decreasing the dominant species which have grown up since we lost our woodland management.  Cattle are unselective and good for retaining diversity through the disturbance they cause by trampling.  They create an uneven tussocky sward with lots of microhabitats, good for many different other species.

Ponies are selective grazers depending on their breed and they create a varied, open, herb-rich sward.  Goats are browsers and eat high quality grasses and trees, control bramble and thorn but eat tree seedlings.  They create an uneven tussocky sward.

So, we can introduce large herbivores and use electric fences, or no-fence collars, to move the herbivores around and mimic the presence of predators.  By making sure to choose species carefully, we can begin to give the landscape back some of its missing natural processes.  Then something quite remarkable starts to happen.

In some places, canopies begin to close, in others, old trees collapse.  Grazers help to open closed forests through debarking or uprooting trees.  Then, when light reaches forest floors, grasses and herbs come into bloom, attracting in more large grazers.  Areas are kept open, and we end up with varying habitat structure across forests.

The grazers eat the most nutritious plants, allowing other plants to regenerate, creating a wealth of diversity for pollinators and invertebrates and hence birds and many other insect predators.  Within open grasslands thorny or poisonous shrubs, like bramble, that may avoid being eaten in the summer, are set back during the lean months, preventing their complete colonisation. 

The digestive systems of these grazers, particularly large cattle and pigs, break down plant matter and convert it into nutrient-rich deposits that feed soil microorganisms which is important for getting seeds into the soil.  They are able to prevent single species from dominating and grass from forming thatch and covering the ground, preventing regeneration, or getting long and dry and catching fire.  Thereby, they can help maintain natural meadows.

Inside hoof tracks, heath and broom germinate and water infiltrates into the ground, increasing absorption and reducing flooding.  Grazing and trampling can create open areas, allowing space for species such as ground nesting birds to move in and bare ground for insects to make their homes, whilst also transferring nutrients and dispersing seeds.  These areas of grasslands and younger forests are resilient and have a more efficient carbon sequestration helping in the effort of climate change mitigation.

Whilst this is ongoing: the trampling, the grazing, the seed dispersal, other areas are able to regenerate.  They create cycles of succession and retrogressive succession: a dynamic mosaic of resilient and biodiverse habitats, something reminiscent of pre-intensive farming.